Law of the Devil

Well, one last time.

I explained it for the last time, and I will not confide a word in the future.

First of all, the author of the book should use an objective standpoint to describe some objective theories, such as leader Lun.

When I wrote that leaders should not have standards of right and wrong, but should only have what is needed and what is not needed.

Many cynics brought up the example of Japanese war criminals to refute me.

That's right, Japanese war criminals are human scum, garbage, and things that are not as good as pigs and dogs. As a Chinese, I certainly think so.

However, it is a pity that for many Japanese people nowadays, they feel that those people are heroes. Haven’t you seen that shit shrine in Japan, and the incense is constantly burning?

This is the difference in position! Many things are bad from our standpoint, but they may think they are good from the enemy's standpoint.

I didn't say that Japanese war criminals are good, some people don't fucking label me a traitor! When I beat the Japanese into the game in Nanjing, those who scolded me, you were still writing essays in school!

What I am talking about is a theory of leadership. Since I am writing a theory, I should jump out of my own standpoint and write from an objective point of view.

I don't want to talk too much about politics, it's too sensitive. Or glance at the Japanese who are not as good as pigs and dogs. Let's talk about England.

The sun never sets on the British Empire - once had colonies all over the world. For the people in the colonies, the British are invaders, bastards, and "bad", but you have to admit that that era, for the British people, they think is the most glorious and proud era.

This is the so-called "position" difference!

For example, in the part where the saint was insulted, what makes me depressed until now is that many people only focus on her being insulted. And ignoring that paragraph, I'm not writing about the saint, but Rose! You only saw the beauties, but ignored the holy knight who did not destroy the faith.

I suddenly remembered that when I was a student, I saw a Western oil painting of the Virgin Mary with a bare chest. For those who understand it, it has a religious meaning: religion and holiness and motherhood! !

But for those who don't understand, the eyes only see the breasts of the woman in the oil painting.

This is why these chapters have brought a lot of controversy.

ps: This is the last time I explain the controversy in the book, the last time, I will not explain anything in the future. .

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like